Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing 




News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, February 14, 2005
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by Tenth Federal Reserve District remained strong in January and plant managers’ expectations for future activity remained high.

A summary of the January survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The January manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kc.frb.org

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District remained strong in January. While several year-over-year indexes---including production---fell somewhat from record or near-record highs in December, a number of other indexes posted solid gains. In addition, expectations for future factory activity were still very high. The year-over-year price indexes both rose, with the index for finished goods prices reaching its highest level in the ten-year history of the survey. Expectations for prices in six months also remained elevated. Month-over-month indexes in the survey were mixed in January, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production fell to 37 in January, down from 50 in December and the lowest reading since last May (Tables 1 & 2). A smaller net percentage of both durable- and nondurable-goods-producing firms than in December reported year-over-year increases in production. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that the decline in the overall production index was due to a smaller number of Colorado and western Missouri firms reporting year-over-year increases in production. Even so, the index remained relatively high by historical standards, and production was still above year-ago levels in all district states.

Other year-over-year indexes of factory activity were mixed in January. The shipments index eased from 52 to 47 and the new orders index fell to 45 from a record-high of 52 in December. Likewise, the employment index dropped quite a bit after rising to a nine-year high in last month’s survey. On the other hand, however, the workweek and backlog indexes both rose, and the inventory indexes---for both raw materials and finished goods---each jumped more than 10 percentage points to reach all-time highs.

The year-over-year price indexes both increased in January after largely holding steady in recent months. The raw materials price index rose from 75 to 81, its highest reading since last July. And the finished goods price index jumped from 41 to 55, easily its highest reading in the ten-year history of the survey. The larger increase in the finished goods price index may suggest an increase in pricing power on the part of some manufacturers. However, the still-sizable gap between the two price indexes suggests a number of firms are still having difficulties passing cost increases through to customers.

Plant managers’ expectations for future factory activity remained high. The six-month-ahead production index rose to 46, its highest reading since last June, and the future shipments and orders indexes were about as strong as in the previous two months. In addition, the future index for new orders for exports rose to its highest level since early 2000, and the future capital spending index remained solid. On the negative side, however, the future employment index edged down for the third straight month. Firms appear to plan to meet some of their future production needs by having current employees work longer housr, as the future workweek index rose to its highest level ever. Finally, the future price indexes were largely unchanged from the past two months. Both indexes were near their record highs set in April 2004, but the gap between the two indexes remained sizable, suggesting some firms expect continued difficulties passing cost increases through to customers.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, January 2005
  January vs. December
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
January vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
43 31 25 18
59 17 22 37
59 25 13 46
Volume of shipments
42 25 31 11
63 19 16 47
58 25 14 44
Volume of new orders
44 32 22 22
61 20 16 45
51 33 10 41
Backlog of orders
31 42 22 9
48 33 14 34
38 41 14 24
Number of employees
20 55 24 -4
38 41 20 18
33 46 17 16
Average employee workweek
22 56 20 2
40 47 11 29
31 54 10 21
Prices received for finished product
21 75 3 18
61 32 6 55
41 51 5 36
Prices paid for raw materials
47 50 1 46
84 10 3 81
64 29 4 60
Capital expenditures  
34 49 14 20
36 47 13 23
New orders for exports
10 69 9 1
19 60 8 11
25 61 2 23
Supplier delivery time
16 80 2 14
31 60 7 24
15 76 6 9
Inventories:      
     Materials
26 51 21 5
44 35 19 25
25 51 20 5
     Finished goods
23 58 16 7
40 41 15 25
22 57 17 5


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The January survey included 112 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Jan'04 Feb'04 Mar'04 Apr'04 May'04 Jun'04 Jul'04 Aug'04 Sep'04 Oct'04 Nov'04 Dec'04 Jan'05
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 17 14 27 28 23 26 20 15 20 20 6 2 18
Volume of shipments 12 19 37 36 14 25 14 25 23 3 4 -1 11
Volume of new orders 21 5 29 34 20 23 21 15 19 18 8 -1 22
Backlog of orders 7 2 10 28 22 4 13 -6 7 3 -3 -7 9
Number of employees 9 7 15 14 18 16 11 12 13 22 4 5 -4
Average employee workweek 9 6 11 17 15 16 21 17 6 12 5 -5 2
Prices received for finished product 9 5 17 28 22 9 16 14 16 15 9 12 18
Prices paid for raw materials 39 38 57 67 56 54 47 52 46 53 43 35 46
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports 9 0 5 9 0 1 1 -6 0 3 5 6 1
Supplier delivery time 4 6 15 27 16 6 16 17 22 13 10 10 14
Inventories:      Materials 9 11 3 15 13 -2 1 13 11 12 5 -5 5
Inventories:      Finished goods -6 3 -6 1 9 0 4 11 6 17 1 -2 7

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 24 27 31 43 35 51 46 50 48 41 44 50 37
Volume of shipments 27 32 34 45 39 46 49 55 51 42 47 53 47
Volume of new orders 30 38 29 52 45 47 51 52 50 42 44 52 45
Backlog of orders 22 25 21 31 33 28 37 27 31 23 30 29 34
Number of employees -2 12 14 19 19 22 15 25 27 25 28 30 18
Average employee workweek 20 19 16 24 21 37 30 29 28 21 17 23 29
Prices received for finished product 8 11 19 37 34 34 42 37 38 41 40 40 55
Prices paid for raw materials 48 50 64 82 75 71 82 73 72 77 74 76 81
Capital expenditures 6 9 18 22 22 23 17 16 30 19 21 18 20
New orders for exports 8 7 10 9 3 2 5 8 7 6 8 12 11
Supplier delivery time 6 7 20 26 20 22 30 24 35 23 19 18 24
Inventories:      Materials -5 3 6 5 16 9 6 17 19 20 18 10 25
Inventories:      Finished goods -7 4 -5 -2 3 1 -3 9 13 12 16 15 25

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 33 43 40 46 36 48 40 39 39 39 38 41 46
Volume of shipments 39 42 45 53 35 44 36 40 38 35 43 41 44
Volume of new orders 38 39 36 46 28 47 36 39 38 37 44 43 41
Backlog of orders 25 23 25 26 17 29 16 9 17 20 26 28 24
Number of employees 12 13 19 28 18 16 15 30 23 26 23 21 16
Average employee workweek 9 10 7 12 5 13 18 14 8 8 6 15 21
Prices received for finished product 15 25 24 39 28 28 31 20 30 30 36 34 36
Prices paid for raw materials 42 48 55 65 57 49 61 55 54 59 59 56 60
Capital expenditures 16 23 22 34 25 23 18 19 25 25 24 20 23
New orders for exports 17 17 15 14 8 7 5 14 10 13 13 12 23
Supplier delivery time 3 5 14 11 13 1 11 14 14 16 8 5 9
Inventories:      Materials -9 -6 1 1 5 -6 -2 11 -5 4 -1 -1 5
Inventories:      Finished goods -12 -2 -10 -2 -2 2 0 9 4 0 1 -8 5



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page