Survey of Tenth District Manufacturers 



Printer friendly html or pdf
News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, February 9, 2004
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to expand during January. Expectations for future factory activity eased somewhat from record levels posted during the fourth quarter of 2003, but firms were still generally as optimistic as they were last summer.

A summary of the January survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The January manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kc.frb.org

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturers
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to expand in January. The year-over-year production index fell somewhat from the five-year high reached in December and the year-over-year new orders index also eased moderately, but both indexes remained quite positive and well above levels posted in recent years. The six-month-ahead indexes for production and new orders also fell back somewhat, although the indexes were still just as high as they were last summer. The month-over-month production index rebounded solidly after dropping nearly to zero in December, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons. Until several years of data are available for seasonal adjustment, this report will focus primarily on changes in activity versus a year ago.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production fell to 24 in January, down from readings in the low- to mid-30s during the fourth quarter of 2003 (Tables 1 & 2). Nevertheless, prior to October 2003, the last time a reading of higher than 24 was posted was in mid-1998. Year-over-year growth eased moderately at both durable- and nondurable-goods-producing firms, but durable producers continued to report solid year-over-year gains and nondurable producers also indicated production was slightly higher than a year ago. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production eased back below year-ago levels in Colorado and western Missouri but remained at or above year-ago levels in the rest of the district.

Like the production index, most other year-over-year indexes of factory activity fell somewhat in January but remained considerably higher than in recent years. The shipments index edged down from 29 to 27, and the new orders index dipped from 45 to 30. Likewise, the employment index fell back below zero in January after posting a positive reading in December for the first time in nearly four years. The capital expenditures index was basically unchanged from December, while the new orders for exports index continued to edge higher following the recent fall in the value of the dollar. The inventory indexes—after rising above zero in December for the first time in over a year—both fell back into negative territory in January. These low inventory levels should continue to provide a boost to production in coming months, as firms seek to replenish stocks after catching up with their strong sales growth during the second half of 2003.

There are tentative signs that greater demand for manufacturing goods in recent months may be allowing firms to pass some of their cost increases through to customers. The year-over-year finished goods price index rose to 8 in January, which, while still modest, was its highest reading since mid-2001. Meanwhile, the year-over-year raw materials index remained very high, at 48, as some firms reported modest increases in import prices and others reported continued increases in the price of steel.

Expectations for future factory activity in the Tenth District eased somewhat from the record levels posted during the fourth quarter of 2003, but firms were still generally as optimistic as they were last summer. The future production index fell from 49 to 33, and the future new orders index eased from 45 to 38. Despite the recent strong increase in demand for their products, firms continue to plan only moderate increases in hiring and investment heading forward. The future employment index edged down to 12 in January, and the future capital expenditures index was unchanged at 16. As for prices, firms continue to expect rising materials prices and a greater ability to pass cost increases through to customers. The future raw materials price index rose from 35 to 42. Meanwhile the future finished goods price index remained in the mid-teens, similar to November and December and up moderately from readings during much of the past four years.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, January 2004
  January vs. December
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
January vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
40 36 23 17
52 18 28 24
51 29 18 33
Volume of shipments
40 29 28 12
53 18 26 27
56 25 17 39
Volume of new orders
47 24 26 21
55 16 25 30
54 26 16 38
Backlog of orders
31 40 24 7
42 31 20 22
41 38 16 25
Number of employees
21 64 12 9
30 34 32 -2
29 51 17 12
Average employee workweek
27 53 18 9
38 43 18 20
27 53 18 9
Prices received for finished product
17 74 8 9
30 47 22 8
26 61 11 15
Prices paid for raw materials
42 52 3 39
56 32 8 48
49 42 7 42
Capital expenditures  
22 55 16 6
28 54 12 16
New orders for exports
14 71 5 9
14 69 6 8
21 65 4 17
Supplier delivery time
11 79 7 4
17 69 11 6
9 81 6 3
Inventories:      
     Materials
28 50 19 9
28 36 33 -5
22 46 31 -9
     Finished goods
18 56 24 -6
23 44 30 -7
18 50 30 -12


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The January survey included 104 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Jan'03 Feb'03 Mar'03 Apr'03 May'03 Jun'03 Jul'03 Aug'03 Sep'03 Oct'03 Nov'03 Dec'03 Jan'04
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 14 8 11 15 1 15 8 20 31 28 6 1 17
Volume of shipments 11 1 19 19 6 22 7 16 30 21 -1 17 12
Volume of new orders 11 16 21 16 7 15 24 22 31 29 14 19 21
Backlog of orders -8 -1 2 -2 0 -1 5 17 2 5 8 1 7
Number of employees -11 -5 -17 -10 -1 -2 3 9 11 4 8 12 9
Average employee workweek 4 12 1 -1 -4 -2 4 18 25 5 8 -4 9
Prices received for finished product 0 -2 -9 -7 -7 -3 -5 -4 -1 -5 -2 3 9
Prices paid for raw materials 12 21 20 9 7 12 8 18 16 17 27 23 39
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports 1 -6 5 -8 2 4 6 7 2 5 -1 7 9
Supplier delivery time 2 -3 3 1 0 -2 0 -1 5 4 8 10 4
Inventories:      Materials -1 -10 6 -7 -25 -18 -6 -14 -4 5 4 -4 9
Inventories:      Finished goods -8 -4 3 -8 0 -10 -12 -11 -8 1 2 -3 -6

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 6 12 -4 0 -10 2 -7 8 17 34 31 35 24
Volume of shipments 5 11 -6 9 -10 1 6 11 20 36 29 29 27
Volume of new orders 4 24 4 7 -2 6 16 22 31 40 41 45 30
Backlog of orders 0 11 -6 -7 -13 -10 -3 3 12 10 21 28 22
Number of employees -27 -32 -21 -29 -33 -30 -17 -8 -13 -8 0 3 -2
Average employee workweek -2 1 -7 -20 -13 -11 -1 9 17 17 18 21 20
Prices received for finished product -11 -3 -7 -2 -7 -4 -5 1 -1 -1 4 2 8
Prices paid for raw materials 23 39 30 28 32 31 31 37 30 39 40 49 48
Capital expenditures -15 -15 -8 -1 -4 -12 -3 0 12 3 14 7 6
New orders for exports 2 -3 -1 -11 0 -5 -5 11 0 5 3 5 8
Supplier delivery time -4 -11 -4 -2 -1 -5 -3 -4 3 -4 8 5 6
Inventories:      Materials -15 -16 -1 -6 -26 -17 -14 -11 -7 -5 -8 9 -5
Inventories:      Finished goods 0 -10 -1 -4 -9 -5 -5 -12 -5 -7 -4 12 -7

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 38 33 33 36 37 32 35 37 36 55 45 49 33
Volume of shipments 44 32 40 38 35 28 28 38 38 49 50 45 39
Volume of new orders 35 38 37 36 36 36 21 40 40 50 45 45 38
Backlog of orders 16 22 16 19 23 23 24 18 22 26 12 25 25
Number of employees 14 17 15 5 9 7 5 23 13 15 24 17 12
Average employee workweek 20 10 13 7 20 8 8 11 13 15 8 19 9
Prices received for finished product 4 11 -3 7 11 5 3 10 10 9 14 17 15
Prices paid for raw materials 24 25 20 22 25 27 17 32 29 27 40 35 42
Capital expenditures 2 9 3 13 13 16 12 15 15 16 19 16 16
New orders for exports 10 5 4 -2 9 6 5 14 13 11 10 14 17
Supplier delivery time -1 9 6 7 12 -3 5 2 8 1 6 2 3
Inventories:      Materials -14 -9 -6 0 -12 -14 -8 0 4 4 -1 4 -9
Inventories:      Finished goods -5 -9 -4 5 -11 -9 0 3 -6 6 3 3 -12



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page