Survey of Tenth District Manufacturers 



Printer friendly html or pdf
News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, March 8, 2004
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, MARCH 8
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to grow strongly during February, while optimism about future activity improved despite increasing concerns over rising input costs

A summary of the February survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The February manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kc.frb.org

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturers
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to grow strongly in February. The year-over-year production and new orders indexes edged higher, and the year-over-year employment index rose solidly into positive territory for the first time in four years. In addition, firms’ optimism about future activity improved despite increasing concerns over rising input costs. While the month-over-month production index edged down slightly, the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons. Until several years of data are available for seasonal adjustment, this report will focus primarily on changes in activity versus a year ago.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production rose to 27 in February, up slightly from 24 in January but down slightly from the six-year highs posted during the fourth quarter of 2003 (Tables 1 & 2). Year-over-year growth in production edged higher at both durable- and nondurable-goods-producing firms, with durable producers continuing to report very solid year-over-year gains and nondurable producers reporting somewhat more modest gains. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production was above year-ago levels in all district states but Colorado.

Like the production index, most other year-over-year indexes of factory activity either rose slightly in February or remained at January’s solid levels. Perhaps most notably, the employment index jumped to 12, its highest reading since mid-1998 and first reading above 5 since early 2000. In addition, the shipments and new orders indexes each rose moderately. The inventory indexes—-for both raw materials and finished goods—-rose back above zero after dropping in January. The backlog and capital expenditures indexes also posted modest gains, while the workweek, exports, and supplier delivery time indexes were largely unchanged from recent months.

Price indexes for both raw materials and finished goods continued to edge upward. The year-over-year raw materials price index increased slightly to 50, matching a four-year high. Many firms reported continued increases in the price of steel in particular, but also in the costs of most energy-based products and numerous other materials. Meanwhile, the year-over-year finished goods price index also continued to edge higher, suggesting firms were having slightly more success raising their selling prices. After rising to 8 in January, the finished goods price index increased to 11 in February, the highest reading since August 2001.

Expectations for future factory activity rebounded somewhat in February, and firms showed somewhat more confidence in their ability to pass cost increases onto their customers. The future production index rose back to 43 in February, after dropping to 33 in January from record highs in the fourth quarter of 2003. The future new orders and shipments indexes also rose slightly after falling in January, and the future capital expenditures index increased to 23, its highest reading since early 1998. In contrast to the rebound in optimism regarding future production and investment, the future employment index was largely unchanged in February and, at 13, remained lower than during several periods over the past few years. As for prices, firms continue to expect rising materials prices and a greater ability to pass cost increases through to customers. The future raw materials price index rose from 42 to 48, as firms anticipate further increases in the price of steel and other materials. Meanwhile, the future finished goods price index rose by a larger amount, from 15 in January to 25 in February, matching its highest reading since 1995 and suggesting that firms expect some pricing power to return in coming months.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, February 2004
  February vs. January
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
February vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
39 35 25 14
51 23 24 27
58 25 15 43
Volume of shipments
43 31 24 19
54 21 22 32
56 28 14 42
Volume of new orders
31 40 26 5
55 24 17 38
55 25 16 39
Backlog of orders
25 47 23 2
40 39 15 25
38 42 15 23
Number of employees
23 58 16 7
40 29 28 12
30 51 17 13
Average employee workweek
26 52 20 6
39 40 20 19
29 50 19 10
Prices received for finished product
15 74 10 5
32 45 21 11
35 53 10 25
Prices paid for raw materials
43 51 5 38
60 27 10 50
57 32 9 48
Capital expenditures  
27 53 18 9
35 52 12 23
New orders for exports
8 74 8 0
18 62 11 7
22 64 5 17
Supplier delivery time
12 80 6 6
15 73 8 7
13 77 8 5
Inventories:      
     Materials
30 49 19 11
29 43 26 3
23 46 29 -6
     Finished goods
25 50 22 3
27 47 23 4
23 49 25 -2


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The February survey included 97 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Feb'03 Mar'03 Apr'03 May'03 Jun'03 Jul'03 Aug'03 Sep'03 Oct'03 Nov'03 Dec'03 Jan'04 Feb'04
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 8 11 15 1 15 8 20 31 28 6 1 17 14
Volume of shipments 1 19 19 6 22 7 16 30 21 -1 17 12 19
Volume of new orders 16 21 16 7 15 24 22 31 29 14 19 21 5
Backlog of orders -1 2 -2 0 -1 5 17 2 5 8 1 7 2
Number of employees -5 -17 -10 -1 -2 3 9 11 4 8 12 9 7
Average employee workweek 12 1 -1 -4 -2 4 18 25 5 8 -4 9 6
Prices received for finished product -2 -9 -7 -7 -3 -5 -4 -1 -5 -2 3 9 5
Prices paid for raw materials 21 20 9 7 12 8 18 16 17 27 23 39 38
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports -6 5 -8 2 4 6 7 2 5 -1 7 9 0
Supplier delivery time -3 3 1 0 -2 0 -1 5 4 8 10 4 6
Inventories:      Materials -10 6 -7 -25 -18 -6 -14 -4 5 4 -4 9 11
Inventories:      Finished goods -4 3 -8 0 -10 -12 -11 -8 1 2 -3 -6 3

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 12 -4 0 -10 2 -7 8 17 34 31 35 24 27
Volume of shipments 11 -6 9 -10 1 6 11 20 36 29 29 27 32
Volume of new orders 24 4 7 -2 6 16 22 31 40 41 45 30 38
Backlog of orders 11 -6 -7 -13 -10 -3 3 12 10 21 28 22 25
Number of employees -32 -21 -29 -33 -30 -17 -8 -13 -8 0 3 -2 12
Average employee workweek 1 -7 -20 -13 -11 -1 9 17 17 18 21 20 19
Prices received for finished product -3 -7 -2 -7 -4 -5 1 -1 -1 4 2 8 11
Prices paid for raw materials 39 30 28 32 31 31 37 30 39 40 49 48 50
Capital expenditures -15 -8 -1 -4 -12 -3 0 12 3 14 7 6 9
New orders for exports -3 -1 -11 0 -5 -5 11 0 5 3 5 8 7
Supplier delivery time -11 -4 -2 -1 -5 -3 -4 3 -4 8 5 6 7
Inventories:      Materials -16 -1 -6 -26 -17 -14 -11 -7 -5 -8 9 -5 3
Inventories:      Finished goods -10 -1 -4 -9 -5 -5 -12 -5 -7 -4 12 -7 4

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 33 33 36 37 32 35 37 36 55 45 49 33 43
Volume of shipments 32 40 38 35 28 28 38 38 49 50 45 39 42
Volume of new orders 38 37 36 36 36 21 40 40 50 45 45 38 39
Backlog of orders 22 16 19 23 23 24 18 22 26 12 25 25 23
Number of employees 17 15 5 9 7 5 23 13 15 24 17 12 13
Average employee workweek 10 13 7 20 8 8 11 13 15 8 19 9 10
Prices received for finished product 11 -3 7 11 5 3 10 10 9 14 17 15 25
Prices paid for raw materials 25 20 22 25 27 17 32 29 27 40 35 42 48
Capital expenditures 9 3 13 13 16 12 15 15 16 19 16 16 23
New orders for exports 5 4 -2 9 6 5 14 13 11 10 14 17 17
Supplier delivery time 9 6 7 12 -3 5 2 8 1 6 2 3 5
Inventories:      Materials -9 -6 0 -12 -14 -8 0 4 4 -1 4 -9 -6
Inventories:      Finished goods -9 -4 5 -11 -9 0 3 -6 6 3 3 -12 -2



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page