Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing 



Printer friendly html or pdf
News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, September 13, 2004
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by Tenth Federal Reserve District continued expanding in August. Plant managers’ expectations for future activity also remained strong while future hiring plans improved.

A summary of the August survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The August manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kc.frb.org

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to expand in August. The year-over-year production index was near a record high, and expectations for future factory activity remained very strong. In addition, future hiring plans improved. The year-over-year price indexes, though still high by historical standards, eased slightly, and expectations for future price increases also moderated somewhat. Most month-over-month indexes continued to rise, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production rose from 46 in July to 50 in August, only slightly below June’s record high of 51 (Tables 1 & 2). The slight increase in August was due to a modest improvement at nondurable-goods-producing firms. Durable goods production also remained well above year-ago levels. Although sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production was above year-ago levels throughout the district.

Most other year-over-year indexes of factory activity improved or remained at high levels in August. The shipments index rose to a new survey high, the new orders index matched its previous high, and the employment index increased moderately after easing for the first time in six months in July. Both of the inventory indexes rose markedly. Indeed, the index for inventories of raw materials rose to its highest level in six years, and the index for inventories of finished goods was solidly positive after dipping below zero in July. The capital expenditures index was virtually unchanged, while the indexes for backlog of orders and supplier delivery times both fell somewhat after rising to record levels in July.

The year-over-year price indexes both fell somewhat in August after rising to new highs in July. The raw materials price index fell from 82 to 73 but was still higher than in June. Similarly, the finished goods price index eased from 42 to 37 but remained higher than June’s reading.

Plant managers’ expectations for future factory activity remained very strong. The six-month-ahead production index edged down to 39 from 40 in July, but the future indexes for shipments, new orders, and capital spending all rose slightly. In a further sign of confidence on the part of manufacturers, the future employment index jumped from 15 to 30. The future price indexes both fell after rising somewhat in July. The future raw materials price index edged down slightly but remained very high at 55. Meanwhile, the future finished goods price index dropped to 20, the lowest reading since January.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, August 2004
  August vs. July
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
August vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
40 31 25 15
66 13 16 50
55 25 16 39
Volume of shipments
48 26 23 25
70 12 15 55
55 27 15 40
Volume of new orders
39 33 24 15
66 16 14 52
54 27 15 39
Backlog of orders
23 42 29 -6
42 35 15 27
30 41 21 9
Number of employees
29 51 17 12
47 28 22 25
44 39 14 30
Average employee workweek
28 57 11 17
37 51 8 29
27 55 13 14
Prices received for finished product
20 69 6 14
51 30 14 37
32 51 12 20
Prices paid for raw materials
57 35 5 52
79 10 6 73
63 25 8 55
Capital expenditures  
34 44 18 16
31 52 12 19
New orders for exports
4 70 10 -6
15 65 7 8
17 66 3 14
Supplier delivery time
21 69 4 17
31 56 7 24
20 69 6 14
Inventories:      
     Materials
32 45 19 13
39 36 22 17
30 47 19 11
     Finished goods
25 55 14 11
29 46 20 9
27 51 18 9


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The August survey included 133 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Aug'03 Sep'03 Oct'03 Nov'03 Dec'03 Jan'04 Feb'04 Mar'04 Apr'04 May'04 Jun'04 Jul'04 Aug'04
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 20 31 28 6 1 17 14 27 28 23 26 20 15
Volume of shipments 16 30 21 -1 17 12 19 37 36 14 25 14 25
Volume of new orders 22 31 29 14 19 21 5 29 34 20 23 21 15
Backlog of orders 17 2 5 8 1 7 2 10 28 22 4 13 -6
Number of employees 9 11 4 8 12 9 7 15 14 18 16 11 12
Average employee workweek 18 25 5 8 -4 9 6 11 17 15 16 21 17
Prices received for finished product -4 -1 -5 -2 3 9 5 17 28 22 9 16 14
Prices paid for raw materials 18 16 17 27 23 39 38 57 67 56 54 47 52
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports 7 2 5 -1 7 9 0 5 9 0 1 1 -6
Supplier delivery time -1 5 4 8 10 4 6 15 27 16 6 16 17
Inventories:      Materials -14 -4 5 4 -4 9 11 3 15 13 -2 1 13
Inventories:      Finished goods -11 -8 1 2 -3 -6 3 -6 1 9 0 4 11

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 8 17 34 31 35 24 27 31 43 35 51 46 50
Volume of shipments 11 20 36 29 29 27 32 34 45 39 46 49 55
Volume of new orders 22 31 40 41 45 30 38 29 52 45 47 51 52
Backlog of orders 3 12 10 21 28 22 25 21 31 33 28 37 27
Number of employees -8 -13 -8 0 3 -2 12 14 19 19 22 15 25
Average employee workweek 9 17 17 18 21 20 19 16 24 21 37 30 29
Prices received for finished product 1 -1 -1 4 2 8 11 19 37 34 34 42 37
Prices paid for raw materials 37 30 39 40 49 48 50 64 82 75 71 82 73
Capital expenditures 0 12 3 14 7 6 9 18 22 22 23 17 16
New orders for exports 11 0 5 3 5 8 7 10 9 3 2 5 8
Supplier delivery time -4 3 -4 8 5 6 7 20 26 20 22 30 24
Inventories:      Materials -11 -7 -5 -8 9 -5 3 6 5 16 9 6 17
Inventories:      Finished goods -12 -5 -7 -4 12 -7 4 -5 -2 3 1 -3 9

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 37 36 55 45 49 33 43 40 46 36 48 40 39
Volume of shipments 38 38 49 50 45 39 42 45 53 35 44 36 40
Volume of new orders 40 40 50 45 45 38 39 36 46 28 47 36 39
Backlog of orders 18 22 26 12 25 25 23 25 26 17 29 16 9
Number of employees 23 13 15 24 17 12 13 19 28 18 16 15 30
Average employee workweek 11 13 15 8 19 9 10 7 12 5 13 18 14
Prices received for finished product 10 10 9 14 17 15 25 24 39 28 28 31 20
Prices paid for raw materials 32 29 27 40 35 42 48 55 65 57 49 61 55
Capital expenditures 15 15 16 19 16 16 23 22 34 25 23 18 19
New orders for exports 14 13 11 10 14 17 17 15 14 8 7 5 14
Supplier delivery time 2 8 1 6 2 3 5 14 11 13 1 11 14
Inventories:      Materials 0 4 4 -1 4 -9 -6 1 1 5 -6 -2 11
Inventories:      Finished goods 3 -6 6 3 3 -12 -2 -10 -2 -2 2 0 9



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page