Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing 



Printer friendly html or pdf
News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, May 9, 2005
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY,MAY 9, 2005
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District expanded less rapidly in April than in the previous two months, but expectations for future activity remained strong. Many firms continued to raise output prices even as growth in materials prices eased somewhat, and further increases in output prices are expected in the months ahead.

A summary of the April survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The April manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City's web site, http://www.kansascityfed.org.

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District expanded less rapidly in April than in the previous two months, but expectations for future activity remained strong. Many firms continued to raise output prices even as growth in materials prices eased somewhat, and further increases in output prices are expected in the months ahead. All of the month-over-month indexes in the survey rose for the third month in a row, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production fell from 44 in March to 32 in April, the lowest reading since March 2004 (Tables 1 & 2). Even at 32, however, the index was relatively high by historical standards. The production index fell somewhat among both durable-goods-producing plants and nondurable-goods-producing plants, though the indexes for both types of firms remained well above zero. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production remained above year-ago levels in all district states.

Other year-over-year indexes of factory activity were mixed. The shipments index fell for the fourth month in a row, dropping from 34 to 24, its lowest reading since late 2003. Several firms noted that they were delaying some shipments to ensure full truckloads and thus save on fuel costs. Like the production and shipments indexes, the new orders index also fell to its lowest level in over a year. More positively, the employment index edged up for the second month in a row, and the capital spending index remained quite high at 29. The inventory indexes both increased nearly 10 points. The index for raw materials inventories rose to 33, its highest reading on record. Similarly, the index for finished goods inventories rose to a ten-year high, perhaps due to the delaying of shipments by some firms.

The gap between the year-over-year price indexes closed considerably in April. The finished goods price index rose to 59, surpassing its previous all-time peak of 55 set in January. Meanwhile, the raw materials price index fell from a record 86 in March to 79 in April. The gap between the two indexes was the smallest in nearly three years, suggesting a greater ability of firms to pass cost increases through to customers.

Plant managers’ expectations for future factory activity improved in April after falling somewhat in March. The six-month-ahead production index rose from 33 to 41. This level was below the high readings of January and February but very similar to the second half of 2004 and still quite high by historical standards. The future shipments index also rose solidly, while the future new orders index remained similar to its high readings of the past year. On a less upbeat note, the future employment and capital spending indexes both fell slightly. Indeed, the future employment index was the lowest since mid-2003. Finally, similar to the year-over-year price indexes, the gap between the future price indexes narrowed somewhat, suggesting some firms expect continued improvement in their ability to past cost increases through to customers.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, April 2005
  April vs. March
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
April vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
39 38 19 20
57 15 25 32
56 26 15 41
Volume of shipments
43 33 21 22
53 16 29 24
57 26 15 42
Volume of new orders
45 35 16 29
55 18 24 31
56 24 16 40
Backlog of orders
34 41 21 13
47 29 19 28
36 45 14 22
Number of employees
26 57 15 11
45 27 25 20
29 51 18 11
Average employee workweek
20 58 19 1
33 43 21 12
22 62 13 9
Prices received for finished product
24 72 2 22
66 25 7 59
44 48 5 39
Prices paid for raw materials
43 50 5 38
83 11 4 79
62 30 6 56
Capital expenditures  
41 43 12 29
38 43 13 25
New orders for exports
11 72 6 5
20 64 6 14
17 68 5 12
Supplier delivery time
10 85 2 8
30 61 7 23
17 75 4 13
Inventories:      
     Materials
33 53 12 21
51 28 18 33
30 43 23 7
     Finished goods
26 54 15 11
42 35 17 25
24 42 26 -2


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The April survey included 98 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Apr'04 May'04 Jun'04 Jul'04 Aug'04 Sep'04 Oct'04 Nov'04 Dec'04 Jan'05 Feb'05 Mar'05 Apr'05
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 28 23 26 20 15 20 20 6 2 18 32 44 20
Volume of shipments 36 14 25 14 25 23 3 4 -1 11 25 40 22
Volume of new orders 34 20 23 21 15 19 18 8 -1 22 26 38 29
Backlog of orders 28 22 4 13 -6 7 3 -3 -7 9 8 13 13
Number of employees 14 18 16 11 12 13 22 4 5 -4 15 14 11
Average employee workweek 17 15 16 21 17 6 12 5 -5 2 8 10 1
Prices received for finished product 28 22 9 16 14 16 15 9 12 18 20 21 22
Prices paid for raw materials 67 56 54 47 52 46 53 43 35 46 49 53 38
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports 9 0 1 1 -6 0 3 5 6 1 6 10 5
Supplier delivery time 27 16 6 16 17 22 13 10 10 14 9 12 8
Inventories:      Materials 15 13 -2 1 13 11 12 5 -5 5 8 11 21
Inventories:      Finished goods 1 9 0 4 11 6 17 1 -2 7 11 7 11

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 43 35 51 46 50 48 41 44 50 37 43 44 32
Volume of shipments 45 39 46 49 55 51 42 47 53 47 42 34 24
Volume of new orders 52 45 47 51 52 50 42 44 52 45 45 42 31
Backlog of orders 31 33 28 37 27 31 23 30 29 34 31 26 28
Number of employees 19 19 22 15 25 27 25 28 30 18 15 18 20
Average employee workweek 24 21 37 30 29 28 21 17 23 29 15 11 12
Prices received for finished product 37 34 34 42 37 38 41 40 40 55 54 51 59
Prices paid for raw materials 82 75 71 82 73 72 77 74 76 81 83 86 79
Capital expenditures 22 22 23 17 16 30 19 21 18 20 26 30 29
New orders for exports 9 3 2 5 8 7 6 8 12 11 18 16 14
Supplier delivery time 26 20 22 30 24 35 23 19 18 24 22 26 23
Inventories:      Materials 5 16 9 6 17 19 20 18 10 25 15 24 33
Inventories:      Finished goods -2 3 1 -3 9 13 12 16 15 25 17 17 25

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 46 36 48 40 39 39 39 38 41 46 48 33 41
Volume of shipments 53 35 44 36 40 38 35 43 41 44 50 33 42
Volume of new orders 46 28 47 36 39 38 37 44 43 41 41 42 40
Backlog of orders 26 17 29 16 9 17 20 26 28 24 18 19 22
Number of employees 28 18 16 15 30 23 26 23 21 16 23 14 11
Average employee workweek 12 5 13 18 14 8 8 6 15 21 10 4 9
Prices received for finished product 39 28 28 31 20 30 30 36 34 36 42 35 39
Prices paid for raw materials 65 57 49 61 55 54 59 59 56 60 61 63 56
Capital expenditures 34 25 23 18 19 25 25 24 20 23 24 30 25
New orders for exports 14 8 7 5 14 10 13 13 12 23 22 7 12
Supplier delivery time 11 13 1 11 14 14 16 8 5 9 6 9 13
Inventories:      Materials 1 5 -6 -2 11 -5 4 -1 -1 5 1 7 7
Inventories:      Finished goods -2 -2 2 0 9 4 0 1 -8 5 1 5 -2



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page