Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing 



Printer friendly html or pdf
News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, April 11, 2005
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, APRIL 11
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by Tenth Federal Reserve District grew solidly in March although plant managers’ expectations for future activity were somewhat lower than in recent months.

A summary of the March survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The March manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kansascityfed.org.

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District grew solidly in March. The year-over-year production index edged higher, and employment and capital spending continued to increase. Price pressures persisted, as the year-over-year and future price indexes remained at or near record highs. All of the month-over-month indexes in the survey rose for the second month in a row, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production edged up to 44 in March from readings of 43 in February and 37 in January (Tables 1 & 2). In March, a slight improvement in the production index among durable-goods-producing plants offset a slight easing among nondurable-goods-producing plants, though production remained well above year-ago levels for both categories of firms. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production was well above year-ago levels in all district states.

Other year-over-year indexes of factory activity generally remained solid. The capital spending index continued to edge higher, rising from 26 to 30, and the employment index rose from 15 to 18. On the other hand, the shipments and new orders indexes fell somewhat from readings in recent months, as did the index for average employee workweek. The inventory indexes were both relatively high by historical standards. The index for materials inventories rose nearly back to its ten-year-high of 25 set in January, while the finished goods inventory index was unchanged at 17.

The year-over-year price indexes diverged only slightly from February’s high levels. The raw materials price index edged up for the fourth straight month, from 83 to 86, to post another record high. The finished goods price index edged down for the second straight month from the record high posted in January, falling from 54 to 51. The slight widening in the gap between the two indexes followed some narrowing earlier in the year and suggests some firms may have encountered difficulties raising prices. However, even though the finished goods price index has eased the last two months, the reading in March was still the third-highest on record.

Plant managers’ expectations for future factory activity in March were somewhat lower than in recent months. The six-month-ahead production index fell from 48 to 33, its lowest reading since January 2004, and the future shipments and employment indexes also fell to their lowest levels in over a year. More positively, the future new orders index was virtually unchanged from the solid readings of the previous four months. In addition, the future capital spending index increased for the third straight month, rising to its highest level since April 2004. The future price indexes showed a similar pattern as the year-over-year price indexes. The future raw materials price index edged up for the third straight month, rising from 61 to 63. The future finished goods price index fell from a record 42 in February to 35 in March, a similar reading as in the three months prior to February. The slight widening in the gap between the two future price indexes suggests more firms than a month ago anticipate difficulties in passing cost increases through to customers. Still, the future finished goods price index remains very high by historical standards, indicating that a sizable number of firms plan to continue raising prices.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, March 2005
  March vs. February
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
March vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
54 34 10 44
63 16 19 44
47 36 14 33
Volume of shipments
51 35 11 40
56 20 22 34
48 34 15 33
Volume of new orders
50 35 12 38
61 18 19 42
55 30 13 42
Backlog of orders
33 43 20 13
44 33 18 26
33 47 14 19
Number of employees
25 62 11 14
40 34 22 18
32 48 18 14
Average employee workweek
23 61 13 10
27 55 16 11
22 58 18 4
Prices received for finished product
21 77 0 21
60 28 9 51
42 47 7 35
Prices paid for raw materials
54 41 1 53
86 9 0 86
68 21 5 63
Capital expenditures  
42 42 12 30
41 45 11 30
New orders for exports
14 71 4 10
22 62 6 16
12 72 5 7
Supplier delivery time
14 81 2 12
30 63 4 26
14 79 5 9
Inventories:      
     Materials
26 57 15 11
43 36 19 24
27 51 20 7
     Finished goods
25 52 18 7
38 35 21 17
26 48 21 5


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The March survey included 109 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
  Mar'04 Apr'04 May'04 Jun'04 Jul'04 Aug'04 Sep'04 Oct'04 Nov'04 Dec'04 Jan'05 Feb'05 Mar'05
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 27 28 23 26 20 15 20 20 6 2 18 32 44
Volume of shipments 37 36 14 25 14 25 23 3 4 -1 11 25 40
Volume of new orders 29 34 20 23 21 15 19 18 8 -1 22 26 38
Backlog of orders 10 28 22 4 13 -6 7 3 -3 -7 9 8 13
Number of employees 15 14 18 16 11 12 13 22 4 5 -4 15 14
Average employee workweek 11 17 15 16 21 17 6 12 5 -5 2 8 10
Prices received for finished product 17 28 22 9 16 14 16 15 9 12 18 20 21
Prices paid for raw materials 57 67 56 54 47 52 46 53 43 35 46 49 53
Capital expenditures n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
New orders for exports 5 9 0 1 1 -6 0 3 5 6 1 6 10
Supplier delivery time 15 27 16 6 16 17 22 13 10 10 14 9 12
Inventories:      Materials 3 15 13 -2 1 13 11 12 5 -5 5 8 11
Inventories:      Finished goods -6 1 9 0 4 11 6 17 1 -2 7 11 7

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production 31 43 35 51 46 50 48 41 44 50 37 43 44
Volume of shipments 34 45 39 46 49 55 51 42 47 53 47 42 34
Volume of new orders 29 52 45 47 51 52 50 42 44 52 45 45 42
Backlog of orders 21 31 33 28 37 27 31 23 30 29 34 31 26
Number of employees 14 19 19 22 15 25 27 25 28 30 18 15 18
Average employee workweek 16 24 21 37 30 29 28 21 17 23 29 15 11
Prices received for finished product 19 37 34 34 42 37 38 41 40 40 55 54 51
Prices paid for raw materials 64 82 75 71 82 73 72 77 74 76 81 83 86
Capital expenditures 18 22 22 23 17 16 30 19 21 18 20 26 30
New orders for exports 10 9 3 2 5 8 7 6 8 12 11 18 16
Supplier delivery time 20 26 20 22 30 24 35 23 19 18 24 22 26
Inventories:      Materials 6 5 16 9 6 17 19 20 18 10 25 15 24
Inventories:      Finished goods -5 -2 3 1 -3 9 13 12 16 15 25 17 17

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production 40 46 36 48 40 39 39 39 38 41 46 48 33
Volume of shipments 45 53 35 44 36 40 38 35 43 41 44 50 33
Volume of new orders 36 46 28 47 36 39 38 37 44 43 41 41 42
Backlog of orders 25 26 17 29 16 9 17 20 26 28 24 18 19
Number of employees 19 28 18 16 15 30 23 26 23 21 16 23 14
Average employee workweek 7 12 5 13 18 14 8 8 6 15 21 10 4
Prices received for finished product 24 39 28 28 31 20 30 30 36 34 36 42 35
Prices paid for raw materials 55 65 57 49 61 55 54 59 59 56 60 61 63
Capital expenditures 22 34 25 23 18 19 25 25 24 20 23 24 30
New orders for exports 15 14 8 7 5 14 10 13 13 12 23 22 7
Supplier delivery time 14 11 13 1 11 14 14 16 8 5 9 6 9
Inventories:      Materials 1 1 5 -6 -2 11 -5 4 -1 -1 5 1 7
Inventories:      Finished goods -10 -2 -2 2 0 9 4 0 1 -8 5 1 5



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page